X user BuryMeBig recently sparked controversy in the XRP community by claiming Ripple lacks appreciation for the support of retail investors who have championed the project through legal battles and community engagement. BuryMeBig argued that despite significant contributions from XRP holders, Ripple hasn’t reciprocated with acknowledgment or recognition. He suggests this disparity undermines their loyalty to the company. crypto expert Crypto Bitlord responded, asserting that the XRP Army was instrumental in Ripple’s survival and success over the years. He contends that without community backing, Ripple would have crumbled and failed long ago. Bitlord highlighted the role of retail XRP holders who sustained Ripple operations during a critical period (2013-2021) by selling XRP directly to the market. This strategy, Bitlord believes, allowed Ripple to fund its business while simultaneously pressuring community members. Bitlord also posed a rhetorical question: has Ripple ever acknowledged the XRP Army’s role in its development? Other users offered their opinions on this debate. One user, random.NPC, agreed with BuryMeBig and argued that Ripple prioritizes corporate contracts over retail investors’ needs. This suggests the company aims to secure institutional support over community involvement or recognition. On the other hand, Kevin Quinton dismissed such criticism as unfounded. He believes Ripple is building a long-term strategy focusing on partnerships and infrastructure for XRP holders in the future. The ongoing discussion between BuryMeBig, Bitlord, and other users highlights differing perspectives on Ripple’s relationship with its supportive community of XRP investors. Some believe Ripple has overlooked this community’s contributions, while others maintain that the company is diligently building a long-term strategy to benefit those who have supported it through challenges.