Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin’s recently proposed FOCIL (Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists) has ignited a debate about censorship resistance within the Ethereum community. This initiative aims to bolster network neutrality and transaction inclusion by enforcing inclusion lists through fork-choice logic. 然而，Buterin insists this is necessary to uphold Ethereum’s core principles. However, the proposal raises concerns among validators regarding potential legal risks and compliance challenges under existing financial regulations. These concerns center around the implementation of enforcement mandates impacting validator operations and potentially leading to legal disputes if implemented. The technical debate revolves around finding a balance between censorship resistance and maintaining Ethereum’s decentralized nature, an issue that was previously tackled during the OFAC-compliant blocks controversy. The core developers and stakeholders continue to analyze FOCIL’s feasibility. If approved, it could significantly impact transaction prioritization and inclusion, with no set implementation date as the proposal is still under community and developer review. This proposal, which aims to enhance network neutrality, may face scrutiny from regulators over its potential impact on validator operations. The evolving debate highlights ongoing tensions in achieving transaction neutrality while complying with financial regulations, reminiscent of past EIP discussions.