Airdrop campaigns have become a popular tool for project token distribution, rewarding early adopters and fostering community engagement. However, concerns about the ethical implications of these initiatives are mounting as the crypto market continues to evolve. 1. While initially appearing fair, airdrop distributions often create unintended consequences, potentially favoring large holders or excluding specific user groups. 2. To promote a truly equitable system, designers must ensure that criteria allow for broad participation and strive for proportional distribution models. This can be achieved by using randomized lotteries or implementing fair criteria. 3. Airdrops can also impact market stability, leading to potential token dumping or artificial price fluctuations. These risks necessitate the implementation of vesting periods during which tokens remain locked, preventing rapid sell-offs that might negatively impact the market. Transparency and clear disclosure play a vital role in maintaining trust and ensuring ethical behavior. By establishing straightforward eligibility criteria, full project disclosures about restrictions, and clearly communicating the vesting period for airdropped tokens, projects can build a foundation of transparency.